Accept For Value And Return For Value Meaning

Introduction

Accept for value and return for value are terms that have been around for quite some time, but have gained much attention in recent years as part of the sovereign citizen movement. These terms are used as a means to discharge debt, but their legality and effectiveness are often questioned. In this article, we will delve into the meaning of accept for value and return for value, their origins, and whether or not they hold any legal merit.

What is Accept for Value?

Accept for value is a concept that originated in the United States and is based on the idea that when a person receives a bill or invoice, they can accept it for value and then use that value to discharge any debts they owe. The idea is that the bill or invoice represents a promise to pay, which can be fulfilled by using the value of the bill itself.

The Theory Behind Accept for Value

The theory behind accept for value is that the government and financial institutions have created a system that allows them to create money out of thin air. By accepting a bill for value, an individual is essentially creating their own money, which can be used to pay off debts.

Does Accept for Value Hold Any Legal Merit?

While the concept of accept for value may seem appealing to some, it has no legal merit. The idea that individuals can create their own money to discharge debts is simply not true. In fact, attempting to use accept for value to discharge debts can lead to serious legal consequences, including fines and even imprisonment.

What is Return for Value?

Return for value is another concept that is often associated with accept for value. It is based on the idea that when a person receives a bill or invoice, they can return it for value and use that value to discharge any debts they owe. The idea is that the bill or invoice represents a promise to pay, which can be fulfilled by returning the bill itself.

The Theory Behind Return for Value

The theory behind return for value is similar to that of accept for value. The idea is that by returning the bill or invoice, the individual is essentially creating their own money, which can be used to pay off debts.

Does Return for Value Hold Any Legal Merit?

Like accept for value, return for value has no legal merit. Attempting to use this concept to discharge debts can lead to serious legal consequences.

The Risks of Using Accept for Value and Return for Value

Using accept for value and return for value to discharge debts can have serious legal consequences. Financial institutions and the government are unlikely to recognize these concepts, and attempting to use them can be seen as a form of fraud. Additionally, individuals who attempt to use these concepts may find themselves facing fines, imprisonment, or other legal repercussions.

The Bottom Line

Accept for value and return for value are concepts that have gained popularity in recent years, but they have no legal merit. Attempting to use these concepts to discharge debts can lead to serious legal consequences. It is important for individuals to understand the risks associated with these concepts and to seek legal advice before attempting to use them.

Conclusion

In conclusion, accept for value and return for value may seem like attractive concepts for discharging debts, but they have no legal merit. Attempting to use these concepts can have serious legal consequences. It is important for individuals to understand the risks associated with these concepts and to seek legal advice before attempting to use them. As always, it is best to pay debts using legal and recognized means.